Note: This guide assumes that Terragrunt Stacks have already graduated from the experimental stage, and was written when Terragrunt Stacks were very close to being marked as generally available. If they are not yet generally available, you will need to use the
--experiment stacks
flag when running Terragrunt commands that use Terragrunt Stacks functionality.
terragrunt-infrastructure-live-example
repositoryIf you have an existing repository that was started using the terragrunt-infrastructure-live-example repository as a starting point, follow the steps below to migrate your existing configurations to take advantage of the patterns available using Terragrunt Stacks.
Before you get started adjusting any of your existing configurations, it’s important to understand the current state of your infrastructure.
How much of it do you regularly update? Does any of it result in frustration or difficulty? Why?
Determine whether it’s a good time to be migrating your infrastructure to new patterns, and if so, how much of it you’re willing to migrate. If you are happy, and successful with your current patterns, you may not need to migrate any existing configuration, and that’s great! Consider this a best practice that you can adopt when you start to introduce new infrastructure, and that you may want to adjust your existing infrastructure configurations over time to take advantage of new patterns.
The advantages of using the new paradigm with Terragrunt Stacks are:
We, at Gruntwork, generally consider this paradigm to be the best practice for managing Infrastructure as Code (IaC) at scale, which is why we’ve created this migration guide to help you transition to it.
If you get overwhelmed at any point, read the Support docs to learn how you can get help.
Now that you’ve determined that you want to migrate some or all of your infrastructure to new patterns, the next step is to ensure that you have a version of Terragrunt that supports the terragrunt.stack.hcl
file.
You can do this by updating the version of Terragrunt you use to the latest available version. If you would like more information on how to update your Terragrunt version, see the Installation guide.
.terragrunt-stack
directories to your repository .gitignore
fileNow that you’re adopting Terragrunt Stacks, you’ll want to add the .terragrunt-stack
directories to your repository .gitignore
file.
echo ".terragrunt-stack" >> .gitignore
git add .gitignore
git commit -m "Add .terragrunt-stack to .gitignore"
This will prevent you from accidentally committing .terragrunt-stack
directories to your repository, which is good because you can always regenerate them on demand using the terragrunt stack generate
command.
All other terragrunt stack
commands also automatically generate the .terragrunt-stack
directory on demand, so you can safely ignore it.
terragrunt.stack.hcl
filesThe infrastructure that you already have can be re-defined using terragrunt.stack.hcl
files, reducing the amount of code that you need to maintain in your repository.
To do this, you’ll need to:
infrastructure-catalog
repository if you don’t already have one to store your infrastructure configurations.infrastructure-catalog
repository in your infrastructure-live
repository via terragrunt.stack.hcl
files.Find a collection of units that you want to abstract into a stack, and define a terragrunt.stack.hcl
file for them.
For example, say you have a collection of units like this, that you want to abstract into a stack:
non-prod
└── us-east-1
└── stateful-ec2-asg-service
├── service
│ └── terragrunt.hcl
├── db
│ └── terragrunt.hcl
└── sgs
└── asg
└── terragrunt.hcl
This collection of units can be abstracted into a single stack by creating a terragrunt.stack.hcl
file in the stateful-ec2-asg-service
directory that references each unit configuration, as defined in your infrastructure-catalog
repository (in this example, the infrastructure-catalog
repository is hosted at git@github.com:acme/infrastructure-catalog.git
):
## non-prod/us-east-1/stateful-ec2-asg-service/terragrunt.stack.hcl
unit "service" {
source = "git::git@github.com:acme/infrastructure-catalog.git//units/ec2-asg-stateful-service"
path = "service"
no_dot_terragrunt_stack = true
## Add any additional configuration for the service unit here
}
unit "db" {
source = "git::git@github.com:acme/infrastructure-catalog.git//units/mysql"
path = "db"
no_dot_terragrunt_stack = true
## Add any additional configuration for the db unit here
}
unit "asg-sg" {
source = "git::git@github.com:acme/infrastructure-catalog.git//units/security-group"
path = "sgs/asg"
no_dot_terragrunt_stack = true
## Add any additional configuration for the asg-sg unit here
}
Note the use of the no_dot_terragrunt_stack
attribute. This is used to prevent Terragrunt from automatically generating the units into a .terragrunt-stack
directory. This is important, because you are probably using path_relative_to_include()
in the key
attribute of the remote_state
block of the root root.hcl
file, which is included in every unit. By specifying no_dot_terragrunt_stack = true
, the generated units will be generated into the same directory as they were before, and the path_relative_to_include()
function will resolve to the same path as before. Migrating to a terragrunt.stack.hcl
file in this way allows you to migrate your infrastructure to the new patterns outlined here at your own pace, and to migrate state between the old and new patterns if you want to.
Now, you can remove the existing unit configurations, and regenerate them on demand using the terragrunt stack generate
command.
cd non-prod/us-east-1/stateful-ec2-asg-service
rm -rf service db sgs
If you have identical unit configurations after performing the following, you can remove the unit configurations again, add them to a .gitignore
file, and commit the new terragrunt.stack.hcl
file.
terragrunt stack generate
non-prod
└── us-east-1
└── stateful-ec2-asg-service
├── terragrunt.stack.hcl
├── service
│ └── terragrunt.hcl ## This should be identical to the unit configuration before
├── db
│ └── terragrunt.hcl ## This should be identical to the unit configuration before
└── sgs
└── asg/
└── terragrunt.hcl ## This should be identical to the unit configuration before
Now that you’ve confirmed generation is working, you can remove the unit configurations again, add them to a .gitignore
file, and commit the new terragrunt.stack.hcl
file.
rm -rf service db sgs
git add terragrunt.stack.hcl service db sgs
git commit -m "Remove unit configurations and add terragrunt.stack.hcl"
echo "service" >> .gitignore
echo "db" >> .gitignore
echo "sgs" >> .gitignore
git add .gitignore
git commit -m "Add unit configurations to .gitignore"
Your repository should now look like this:
non-prod
└── us-east-1
└── stateful-ec2-asg-service
├── .gitignore
└── terragrunt.stack.hcl
You can repeat this process as much as you want, abstracting more and more of your infrastructure into Terragrunt Stacks.
_envcommon
directoryThe _envcommon
directory is no longer needed to create “Don’t Repeat Yourself” (DRY) configurations with Terragrunt, and is no longer recommended as a best practice.
If you would like to remove usage of the _envcommon
directory, you can do so by replacing usage of the include
block referencing the _envcommon
directory with content directly committed to terragrunt.hcl
files.
For example, say you have a terragrunt.hcl
file that looks like this:
## non-prod/us-east-1/mysql/terragrunt.hcl
include "root" {
path = find_in_parent_folders("root.hcl")
}
include "envcommon" {
path = "${dirname(find_in_parent_folders("root.hcl"))}/_envcommon/mysql.hcl"
expose = true
}
terraform {
source = "${include.envcommon.locals.base_source_url}?ref=v0.8.0"
}
inputs = {
instance_class = "db.t2.medium"
allocated_storage = 100
}
and an _envcommon/mysql.hcl
file that looks like this:
## _envcommon/mysql.hcl
locals {
environment_vars = read_terragrunt_config(find_in_parent_folders("env.hcl"))
env = local.environment_vars.locals.environment
base_source_url = "git::git@github.com:acme/infrastructure-catalog.git//modules/mysql"
}
inputs = {
name = "mysql_${local.env}"
instance_class = "db.t2.micro"
allocated_storage = 20
storage_type = "standard"
master_username = "admin"
}
This pattern was previously used to create “Don’t Repeat Yourself” (DRY) configurations with Terragrunt. However, this pattern is no longer recommended as a best practice, and is no longer needed to create DRY configurations with Terragrunt.
Instead, you can create a terragrunt.hcl
file in your infrastructure-catalog
repository that looks like this:
## units/mysql/terragrunt.hcl
include "root" {
path = find_in_parent_folders("root.hcl")
}
terraform {
source = "git::git@github.com:acme/infrastructure-catalog.git//modules/mysql?ref=${values.version}"
}
inputs = {
## Required inputs
name = values.name
instance_class = values.instance_class
allocated_storage = values.allocated_storage
storage_type = values.storage_type
master_username = values.master_username
master_password = values.master_password
## Optional inputs
skip_final_snapshot = try(values.skip_final_snapshot, null)
engine_version = try(values.engine_version, null)
}
Then reference that terragrunt.hcl
file in your terragrunt.stack.hcl
files, like so:
## non-prod/us-east-1/terragrunt.stack.hcl
unit "mysql" {
source = "git::git@github.com:acme/infrastructure-catalog.git//units/mysql"
path = "mysql"
## As discussed above, this prevents Terragrunt from automatically generating the units into a `.terragrunt-stack` directory.
no_dot_terragrunt_stack = true
values = {
version = "v0.8.0"
name = "mysql_dev"
instance_class = "db.t2.micro"
allocated_storage = 20
storage_type = "standard"
master_username = "admin"
}
}
Now, all your unit configurations can be found directly in the terragrunt.hcl
file in the infrastructure-catalog
repository, without having to bounce around between different included or referenced files, and you have an explicit interface for the values that can be set externally, via the values
attribute.
Different environments can pin different versions of the unit, and that allows for easy atomic updates (and rollbacks) of both OpenTofu/Terraform module versions and Terragrunt unit configurations if needed.
Chances are, if you’re currently performing Terragrunt updates via a CI/CD pipeline (and you aren’t using Gruntwork Pipelines), your CI/CD pipeline doesn’t yet have integration with Terragrunt Stacks.
There are a few options for how to proceed here.
You can simply commit the generated .terragrunt-stack
directories to your repository.
This is the easiest option when managing CI/CD yourself, but it also means that you won’t gain some of the benefits that come from using Terragrunt Stacks. When getting started, however, this is a good way to avoid the additional technical debt that comes from having to update your CI/CD pipeline to support Terragrunt Stacks, while learning how to use terragrunt.stack.hcl
files, and reorganizing your infrastructure configurations.
To do this, remove the .terragrunt-stack
entry from your .gitignore
file, and commit the changes to your repository. You can then manually run the terragrunt stack generate
command to generate the .terragrunt-stack
directories on demand, and commit them to your repository, allowing your CI/CD pipeline to completely ignore the fact that you’re using Terragrunt Stacks. The units generated by the terragrunt stack generate
command are completely compatible with units that you can author manually, so you don’t have to worry about any incompatibility issues that might arise from this approach.
You can configure your CI/CD pipeline to run the terragrunt stack generate
command whenever your pipeline runs, and leverage the generated .terragrunt-stack
directories in your pipeline.
Depending on the complexity of your CI/CD pipeline, this might be as simple as performing the following:
terragrunt stack generate
terragrunt run --all plan/apply --non-interactive
This doesn’t account for destroys or the reduction of blast radius for changes by carefully inspecting Git diffs, but it’s a good start for users that don’t have CI/CD pipelines that are too complex.
There is an open RFC in GitHub (Filter Flag) that would allow for this kind of complex filtering out of the box with Terragrunt, but at the moment, it’s still an open RFC.